Behavioural Engagement in Visual Programming Online Course Gamification

Authors

  • Annisa Miranda Permatasari Universitas Negeri Malang Author
  • Saida Ulfa Universitas Negeri Malang Author
  • Dedi Kuswandi Universitas Negeri Malang Author
  • Yerry Soepriyanto State University of Malang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70125/jetsar.v1i1y2024a2

Keywords:

gamification, visual programming, behavioral engagement

Abstract

Visual programming is one of the courses offered in the bachelor's degree in educational technology. Based on a survey in the field, almost 85% of educational technology students do not have a background in learning programming. To provide motivation in learning visual programming, gamification is required in implementation. Usually the gamification principle is held offline. This study aims to determine the behavioral engagement of students during lectures by implementing online gamification. The method used was a survey of 98 students who were taking classes at the 8th meeting. The results showed that empirically the level of student behavioral engagement in visual programming courses was good in the high and medium categories, although some were categorized as low. Hypothetically, students are taking lectures at high and moderate levels. The overall results are discussed in the discussion section of the article.

Author Biographies

  • Annisa Miranda Permatasari, Universitas Negeri Malang

    Departemen Teknologi Pendidikan

  • Saida Ulfa, Universitas Negeri Malang

    Departemen Teknologi Pendidikan

  • Dedi Kuswandi, Universitas Negeri Malang

    Departemen Teknologi Pendidikan

  • Yerry Soepriyanto, State University of Malang

    Educational Technology

References

Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., & Furlong, M.J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran (Vol. 118). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Aris, N., Aris Syaifuddin, & None Yerry Soepriyanto. (2024). GAMIFICATION DEVELOPMENTS IN EDUCATION. Scholaria, 14(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2024.v14.i2.p177-186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2024.v14.i2.p177-186

Asiksoy, G., & Canbolat, S. (2021). The Effects of the Gamified Flipped Classroom Method on Petroleum Engineering Students' Pre-class Online Behavioural Engagement and Achievement. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 11(19), 10-3991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v11i5.21957

Bouchrika, I., Harrati, N., Wanick, V., & Wills, G. (2021). Exploring the impact of gamification on student engagement and involvement with e-learning systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(8), 1244-1257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1623267

Caro-Alvaro, S., Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A., De-Marcos, L., & Martinez-Herriaz, J. J. (2017). Development of a social gamified platform for e-learning. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1294193

Conner, T. (2016). Relationships: The key to student engagement. International journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 13-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14257/ijel.2016.5.1.02

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. & Nacke, L. (2011). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification". Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (p./pp. 9--15), New York, NY, USA: ACM. ISBN: 978-1-4503-0816-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Ding, L., Kim, C., & Orey, M. (2017). Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 115, 126-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.016

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

González, A., Paoloni, P., Donolo, D.S., & Rinaudo, C. (2015). Behavioral engagement and disaffection in school activities: exploring a model of motivational facilitators and performance outcomes. Anales De Psicologia, 31, 869-878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.3.176981

Hadihabibi, M., Setyosari, P., & Soepriyanto, Y. (2023). Pengaruh Flipped Classroom Beraktivitas Gamifikasi Tradisional Terhadap Self Regulated Learning Pada Pembelajaran Pemrograman Visual. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(1), 026–036. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v6i12023p026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v6i12023p026

‌Hart, S.R., Stewart, K., & Jimerson, S.R. (2011). The Student Engagement in Schools Questionnaire (SESQ) and the Teacher Engagement Report Form-New (TERF-N): Examining the Preliminary Evidence. Contemporary School Psychology: Formerly "The California School Psychologist", 15, 67-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340964

Huang, B., Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioral and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1106-1126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653

Jenkins, T. (2001). The motivation of students of programming. In Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 53-56). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/377435.377472

Jimerson, S.R., Campos, E., & Greif, J.L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340893

Khusnul Khuluq, Dedi Kuswandi, & Yerry Soepriyanto. (2023). Project-Based Learning dengan Pendekatan Gamifikasi: Untuk Pembelajaran yang Menarik dan Efektif. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 072–072. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v6i22023p072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v6i22023p072

Kim, S., Song, K., Lockee, B., & Burton, J. (2018). Gamification in Learning and Education: Enjoy Learning Like Gaming. ISBN: 978-3-319-47283-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47283-6

Kuo, Ming-Shiou & Chuang, Tsung-Yen & Chuang, Ting-Chieh & Chen, Po-Yu & Lin, Hsin-Chih. (2014). Gamification in Academia Practice – What Motivate Users Most. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2014.

Li, F., Qi, J., Wang, G., & Wang, X. (2014). Traditional Classroom vs E-learning in Higher Education: Difference between Students’ Behavioral Engagement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 9(2), pp. 48–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i2.3268

Liu, H., & Zhong, C. (2018, October). Assessing programming education approaches for college beginners with different backgrounds. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 136-139). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290511.3290577

Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: the effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 464-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541910

Mladenova, T., Kalmukov, Y., & Valova, I. (2020). Covid 19–A major cause of digital transformation in education or just an evaluation test. TEM journal, 9(3), 1163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-42

O’Donovan, S. (2012). Gamification of the Games Course.

Ogbonna, C. G., Ibezim, N. E., & Obi, C. A. (2019). Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word processing: An experimental approach. South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n2a1383

Pandit, D., & Agrawal, S. (2021). Exploring challenges of online education in COVID times. FIIB Business Review, 2319714520986254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520986254

Rehman, R., & Fatima, S. S. (2021). An innovation in Flipped Class Room: A teaching model to facilitate synchronous and asynchronous learning during a pandemic. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 37(1), 131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3096

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education, 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/3502

Taşkın, N., & Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2022). Effects of Gamification on Behavioral and Cognitive Engagement of Students in the Online Learning Environment. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2096190

Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23.

Werbach, K., Hunter, D. (2012). For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Philadelphia: Wharton Digital Press.

Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

Published

2024-08-31

Data Availability Statement

The data are not available publicy. Ask for request

Issue

Section

Research Section

How to Cite

Permatasari, A. M., Ulfa, S., Kuswandi, D., & Soepriyanto, Y. (2024). Behavioural Engagement in Visual Programming Online Course Gamification. Journal of Educational Technology Studies and Applied Research, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.70125/jetsar.v1i1y2024a2